Most Carbon Dragons exceed the design weight. This is true for all homebuilts. The Carbon Dragon was designed and built to be a proof-of-concept ... not to be a production glider. Maupin's theory about additional parts for the glider are, "... But remeber, when you think of adding anything, the basic principal is ... go out in the yard and throw it up in the air. If it comes down ... it's too heavy." [Builder's Manual, page 9]. The prototype has almost no finish coat to save weight. According to Gary Osoba, most of the additional weight in newer Carbon Dragons comes from building a stronger wing. Also, some additional weight comes from better weather-proofing.
I have developed an Excel spreadsheet
(download is 49, 152 Bytes) which contains the mass balance of all the
parts for one wing panel for the Carbon Dragon.
Note: to download this Excel file Using Microsoft
Internet Explorer
- click
the right button and a pull-down menu will appear
- click on Save Target
As ...
Note: to download this Excel file Using Netscape
Navigator
- click the left button, a notice
should appear to either download the file or open it (in
Excel or Works)
- if Netscape attempts to
open the file as a *.htm window, you need to change your preferences
(Email
me for help)
I will be re-editing the spreadsheet soon, so you might want to download
later after this line is removed.
The intent of this spreadsheet is to provide the foundation for analyzing design changes.
A B
C D E
1
xxx
2
So look on Drawing 9 about part way across on the top (see
xxx)
3
4
5
Sample information found on the spreadsheet:
| One wing panel
(including aileron) |
|
34.3 pounds | . |
| Design information for wing panel | . | 37.5 pounds | . |
| 1/32nd plywood Spar Web | . | 27.2 oz | . |
| Vertical Stiffeners |
|
0.5 oz | Dwg 7 - B3 |
| Sparcap carbon tows | . | 1 pound | . |
| One aileron | . | 7.6 pounds | . |
| Aileron lead balance weight
(ref: page 17 of builder's manual) |
. | . | 11.85 oz (calculated)
0.75 # (manual) |
If you have trouble down loading the file, send me a Email and I will forward the spreadsheet as an attachment. S. Steve Adkins
WARNING: Do not make design changes without proper design analysis. See Irv Culver's analysis for the Windrose to develop an appreciation for the effort required. In EAA Experimenter, there was a photo of a busted wing on an acrobatic homebuilt ... the owner had added a stiffening plate behind the spar ... the wing broke just outside of the plate. The point is, adding strength in one area may move the forces to an area not design to carry the stress.