The Scum at the Top
Commentary on the Rats in Washington
Rove ignores committee's subpoena, refuses to testify
CNN
© July 10, 2008
Story Highlights
- Karl Rove ordered to testify before the House
Judiciary Committee
- Rove's lawyers say "executive privilege" makes
him "immune" from subpoena
- Panel is investigating whether Rove was involved
in firing of U.S. attorneys
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Karl Rove, President Bush's
longtime political guru, refused to obey an order
to testify before a House Judiciary Committee hearing
Thursday.
Rove's lawyer asserted that Rove was "immune" from
the subpoena the committee had issued, arguing that
the committee could not compel him to testify due to
"executive privilege."
The panel is investigating allegations that Rove
and his White House allies dismissed U.S. attorneys
and prosecuted officials who they saw as political
opponents.
The panel subpoenaed Rove in May after his lawyer,
Robert D. Luskin, made clear the former White House
deputy chief of staff would not appear voluntarily.
Luskin responded immediately that Rove still would
not appear, prompting a threat of prosecution from the
Judiciary Committee chairman, Rep. John Conyers, a
Michigan Democrat, and Rep. Linda Sanchez, a California
Democrat who chairs the subcommittee on commercial
and administrative law.
"A refusal to appear in violation of the subpoena
could subject Mr. Rove to contempt proceedings,
including statutory contempt under federal law and
proceedings under the inherent contempt authority of
the House of Representatives," Conyers and Sanchez wrote.
"We are unaware of any proper legal basis for Mr.
Rove's refusal to even appear today as required by the
subpoena," Sanchez said Thursday morning when Rove
failed to show up. "The courts have made clear that
no one -- not even the president -- is immune from
compulsory process. That is what the Supreme Court
rules in U.S. v. Nixon and Clinton v. Jones."
In May, Conyers contrasted Rove's refusal to testify
before Congress with his paid work as a commentator
for the Fox News Channel and Newsweek magazine.
"Although he does not seem the least bit hesitant to
discuss these very issues weekly on cable television
and in the print news media, Mr. Rove and his attorney
have apparently concluded that a public hearing room
would not be appropriate. Unfortunately, I have no choice
today but to compel his testimony on these very important
matters."
Rove's lawyer cited a letter from the Justice Department
saying Rove is "constitutionally immune from compelled
congressional testimony." He said Rove is willing to
submit to an "informal interview" or to answer written
questions about the prosecution of former Alabama Gov.
Don Siegelman, whose ouster Rove is accused of orchestrating.
"Threatening Mr. Rove with sanctions will not in any
way expedite the resolution of the issue," Luskin wrote
in a letter to the panel on Wednesday.
Luskin noted in May that his client had already received
a separate subpoena from the Senate Judiciary Committee.
"While the [House] committee has the authority to issue
a subpoena, it is hard to see what this will accomplish,
apart from a 'Groundhog Day' replay of the same issues
that are already the subject of litigation," the lawyer
wrote, referring to a movie in which a person lives the
same day over and over again.
Luskin added that "issues of executive privilege and
separation of powers" could limit Rove's testimony.
In response, Conyers said the two committees are
focusing on different matters, with the House committee
delving into the prosecution of the former Alabama
governor, a Democrat who lost his bid for re-election
in 2002 and was convicted on corruption charges in 2006.
Conyers also noted that other former White House
officials have testified under subpoena in the past
and have dealt with issues of executive privilege on
a case-by-case basis. "Mr. Rove should follow the same
course," he said.
Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the top Republican on the
House Judiciary Committee, called the subpoena "a sham."
The Democratic-controlled Congress has been battling
for months to force the White House to disclose information
about the firing of the attorneys and the prosecution of
Siegelman.
Current and former White House aides have refused to
testify, citing executive privilege.
The Scum at the Top - Home
E-mail: dwagner2@isd.net
©2008 DJW
Last Modified:
September 22, 2008