The Scum at the Top
Commentary on the Rats in Washington
Commentary: Make wearing a flag pin the 28th Amendment
By Roland S. Martin
CNN
© 2008
Story Highlights
- Roland Martin says flag lapel pin debate is useless,
tiresome and distracting
- He asks: If those pins are so important, why shouldn't
underwear, hats be, too?
- Decisions about candidates should be based on substance,
he says
- He says topics such as secure borders, drug fight,
economy are real issues
(CNN) -- When is the last time you watched a mindless
movie that had no redeeming value for you intellectually,
but all it did was make you laugh?
That perfectly describes the raging debate among voters
and the rabid television and radio talk show hosts who
love to yell and scream from the top of their lungs, "I'm
an American, and by golly, you better show as much
appreciation for this country as I do!"
But once you finish listening to these high-minded
bloviators -- and yes, that includes the voters who have
bought into this nonsensical issue -- ask yourself: Does
it really have anything to do with anything?
I've watched this debate reach the levels of absurdity
this year because journalists and commentators have raised
the question to Sen. Barack Obama, "Why don't you wear a
flag lapel pin?"
I really got a kick out of that one during the ABC debate
last month because not one person on stage -- Sens.
Hillary Clinton and Obama, along with moderators Charlie
Gibson and George Stephanopoulos -- bothered to accessorize
their attire with a flag lapel pin.
Sen. John McCain has been traveling the globe as the
presumptive Republican presidential nominee, and this
former Navy pilot often doesn't wear a flag lapel pin.
It has become sort of like bird watching as I've surveyed
elected officials on the local and national levels and
looked them over like a hen-pecked mother or a
foaming-at-the-mouth military drill sergeant, studying
their attire and deeming them insufficiently American
because of their lack of decency and respect by refusing
to adorn themselves appropriately with a lapel pin.
So, after listening to radio callers and the folks that
e-mail various TV shows, maybe we ought to expand this
need to express our Americanism even further. Shouldn't
we insist that our politicians all begin to sport red,
white and blue socks in order to feel good knowing that
they are walking as Americans? How about asking
officeholders to sport the American colors as undergarments
to show that their undying love for the country is so
important, they want the flag pressed against their
skin?
There have been times when the candidates -- especially
McCain, who has beaten back skin cancer -- have worn
hats on the campaign trail. I want to know, datgummit,
why the people running for the highest office in the
land didn't cover their head with an American flag
baseball cap to express to the nation their love and
affection for the U.S. of A.
Since it is clear that our nation is paralyzed and so not
able to close our borders, feed the homeless, develop
businesses in the inner cities and save people from having
their homes taken by foreclosure due to ruthless mortgage
companies, all because some folks don't wear a flag lapel
pin, we need to lead a national movement to demand that
Congress and the states make requiring officeholders to
wear a flag lapel pin the 28th Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution.
See, if it is so important, then take it all the way.
Don't make it optional. Don't leave it up to someone to
choose to wear a flag lapel pin. Let's really show those
politicians that nothing is more important to us than
seeing them with the U.S. flag on our chest.
That's what zealots do. They take something so simple,
so personal, so voluntary, and absolutely lose their mind,
trying to force someone else to do as them, and everyone
else be damned.
Folks, the first year I ever cast a ballot for political
office was in 1988. And in the last 20 years, whether it
was mayoral, school board, city council, or a statewide,
congressional or presidential campaign, the thought of
what was on a politician's lapel never entered into the
equation as to whether they are worthy of office.
Those who will criticize me will say, "Well, Roland, if
it's no big deal, then why not wear one?" And the reply
is the same: "If it's no big deal, then why do you make
it a big deal?"
Let me tell you something: When I'm on the golf course and
I slip my wedding ring into my golf bag, the Rev. Jacquie
Hood Martin is still my wife. When we shoot hoops and I
remove my Texas A&M University ring from my right hand,
I still love my school. The fact that I can no longer wear
my 1987 class ring from Houston's Jack Yates High School
doesn't mean I don't cherish the crimson and gold. And I
may not be able to fit into the shirt I pledged in, but
I will be a member of Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity Inc.
until the day I die.
I am an unapologetic Christian, but you won't see a cross
dangling from my neck or a James Avery charm bracelet on
my wrist. Why? Because my love of Jesus Christ is in my
heart.
This debate is useless, tiresome and distracting. Why?
Because if there are members of Congress who wear a flag
lapel pin but refuse to shore up our borders, don't do enough
to stop the flow of drugs into our neighborhoods, or don't
help to eradicate the gaps between the haves and have nots,
then are they truly fighting for the concerns of Americans,
or playing on the emotions of people by what's on their
lapel?
We're better than that. We're smarter than that. It's time
that we make decisions based on substance, which is what
we say we actually care about. But maybe we're just lying
to ourselves about that, too.
Roland S. Martin is a nationally award-winning journalist
and CNN contributor. Martin is studying to receive his
master's degree in Christian communications at Louisiana
Baptist University. You can read more of his columns at
http://www.rolandsmartin.com/
The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those
of the writer.
The Scum at the Top - Home
E-mail: dwagner2@isd.net
©2008 DJW
Last Modified:
September 21, 2008